Use Case · AI / ML

The clinical data foundation your AI deserves.

We build clean, normalized, linked datasets — with de-identification, governance and FHIR / OMOP modeling — so your analytics and ML teams stop fighting CSVs and start shipping models.

Why this matters

Most healthcare AI fails on the data, not the model

Inconsistent identifiers

Subjects, providers and encounters scattered across systems with no resolved keys.

Unmodeled context

Labs without units, meds without RxNorm, diagnoses without ICD-10 mapping — models learn noise.

Unsafe data sharing

Teams ship raw PHI to notebooks because the platform has no governed sandbox.

Workflow

From raw clinical data to ML-ready features

Step 01

Ingest

2–3 weeks

Stream EHR, EDC, claims, labs and devices into a governed lakehouse with schema evolution and replay built in.

Prerequisites
  • Source access & data sharing agreements
  • Lakehouse landing zone
  • PHI / consent inventory
Deliverables
  • Streaming & batch connectors
  • Bronze + silver lake zones
  • Schema registry & replay tooling
Tip: click any step above to inspect its plan.
Outcomes

What ML teams notice first

10×
Faster feature iteration
OMOP
+ FHIR dual modeling
0
PHI in training environments
Days
From request to governed dataset
What's included

A foundation your AI roadmap can build on

  • Patient / encounter master index
  • FHIR R4 + OMOP CDM dual modeling
  • RxNorm, LOINC, SNOMED CT and ICD-10 mapping
  • De-identification (Safe Harbor + Expert Determination)
  • Feature store with versioning and lineage
  • Governed notebook / Vertex AI / SageMaker sandbox
  • Model evaluation harness and bias monitoring
  • Audit-ready access logs and consent enforcement
Where it runs

Built on the cloud you already use

GCP

BigQuery + Cloud Healthcare API + Vertex AI — plus help applying for GCP credits where eligible.

AWS

HealthLake + Redshift / Lake Formation + SageMaker with Bedrock-ready data.

Azure

Health Data Services + Synapse / Fabric + Azure ML with Purview governance.

FAQ

AI dataset questions

Do you do de-identification?+

Yes — both Safe Harbor and Expert Determination paths, with documented methodology and re-identification risk reports.

FHIR or OMOP?+

Usually both. FHIR for clinical interoperability and OMOP for analytics and ML — modeled from the same source of truth.

Can you support LLM / RAG use cases?+

Yes. We build governed embedding pipelines, terminology-aware chunking and retrieval indexes over clinical content.

How do you prevent PHI leaking into models?+

Through environment segmentation, de-id at ingest, column-level policies and pre-deployment scanning of artifacts.

Free discovery call

Give your AI team the data foundation it actually needs.

Tell us your use case — we'll send a reference architecture and a 6-week starter plan.

  • ✓ Senior engineer reviews your inquiry
  • ✓ Reply within 1 business day
  • ✓ US-based, HIPAA-aware
  • ✓ Scoped plan in 48 hours

No spam. We reply within 1 business day. HIPAA-aware, US-based team.